Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5969 (UTT)

NARENDER KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/940/2025 · 2026-05-26

Pankaj Purohit

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:4164 SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS No.940 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. (through V.C.) Mr. Deepak Joshi, learned counsel for petitioner. 2. Mr. Bhupendra Singh Koranga, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand/ respondent No.1. 3. Ms. Shazia Parveen, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Parikshit Saini, learned counsel for respondent No.2-National Medical Commission. 4. Ms. Devika Tiwari, learned counsel for respondent Nos.3 and 4. 5. Mr. Prateek Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent No.5. 6. Mr. Siddharth Bankoti, learned counsel for respondent No.6. 7. Learned counsel for the parties unanimously made a statement at Bar that the present writ petition has rendered infructuous due to subsequent development, wherein, National Medical Commission has directed the Uttarakhand Medical Council to proceed with the inquiry against respondent No.5. 8. Since, a direction has already issued by National Medical Commission to conduct the inquiry against respondent No.5, therefore, the present writ petition has rendered infructuous. 9. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 26.05.2026 PN