Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5966 (JHR)

RAJ KUMAR CHOUDHARY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/100/2026 · 2026-04-09

Deepak Roshan

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:10258 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt Case (Civil) No. 100 of 2026 -- 1. Raj Kumar Choudhary, aged about 52 years, son of Shri Jevkant Choudhary, resident of Quarter No.CD- 677, OHC, Dhurwa, P.O.-Dhurwa, Ranchi. P.S.- Jagarnathpur, District-Ranchi 2. Amit Kumar, aged about 56 years, son of Late Sachidanand Singh, resident of Mansarovar, Near Sony Godown, Hatia, P.O. & P.S.-Hatia, District- Ranchi. 3. Balvant Kumar, aged about 56 years, son of Late Bikrama Singh, resident of Quarter No.CD-489, Sector-2, Dhurwa, P.O.-Dhurwa, P.S.-Jagarnathpur, District-Ranchi. .......Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Shri Ranjeet Kumar, son of not known to the Petitioner, the Secretary, Jharkhand Vidhan Sabha, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi. .....Opposite Parties -- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN -- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the O.P.-State : Mr. Gaurang Jajodia, A.C to G.P.-II For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate -- 02/09.04.2026 I.A. No. 4838 of 2026 The instant Interlocutory Application has been preferred by the petitioners for withdrawal of instant contempt petition. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the instant contempt application may be disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioners to challenge the reasoned and speaking order, if so advised. 3. There is no objection from the opposite parties. 2026:JHHC:10258 2 4. Accordingly, the instant contempt application is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to the petitioners to challenge the reasoned and speaking order. 5. The instant I.A stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 9th April, 2026 Jk Uploaded on 16/04/2026