Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 59659 (MAD)

Shilpa Prabhakar Satish, IAS v. A.Nagalakshmi @ Kumari

SUB APPL/741/2026 · 2026-08-14

C V Karthikeyan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Cont.P.No.1335 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14-08-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN Sub.Aplc.No.741 of 2026 in Cont.P.DR.No.65461 of 2026 Mrs.A.Nagalakshmi ... Petitioner Vs. 1. Mrs.Shilpa Prabhakar Satish, I.A.S., Secretary, rep., the State of Tamil Nadu, Commercial Taxes and Registration Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009. 2. Mr.Dinesh Ponraj Oliver, I.A.S., The Inspector General of Registration, Office of the Inspector General of Registration, Santhome, Chennai – 600 004. 3. Mrs.Srividhya, The District Registrar of Societies, District Registration Office, Saidapet, Chennai – 600 015. 4. D.Magesh, Special Officer, District Registrar, Dindigul. ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition is filed under Section 151 C.P.C, praying to accept the 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.1335 of 2026 cause title in Sub Application in Cont.P.No.65461 of 2026. For Petitioner : M/s.K.Nithya Shree For Respondents : Mr.M.P.Senthil Government Pleader ORDER The present petition has been filed to accept the cause title by impleading the Special Officer, who has been appointed as a further respondent in the contempt petition. 2. In the writ petition, orders have been passed to appoint a Special Officer. He had been appointed to conduct elections. It is the grievance of the petitioner that accounts have not been regularised. 3. The learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents has stated that the accounts have been seized by the Criminal Court. Since there are allegations of misappropriation, contempt cannot be made out against a person against whom no specific direction has been issued in the writ petition. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.1335 of 2026 4. I am not inclined to pass orders acceding to the representation made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Accordingly, the Sub Application stands dismissed. Consequently, the Contempt Petition stands rejected. 14-08-2026 rgm C.V. KARTHIKEYAN , J. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.1335 of 2026 rgm To 1. Mrs.Shilpa Prabhakar Satish, I.A.S., Secretary, rep., the State of Tamil Nadu, Commercial Taxes and Registration Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009. 2. Mr.Dinesh Ponraj Oliver, I.A.S., The Inspector General of Registration, Office of the Inspector General of Registration, Santhome, Chennai – 600 004. 3. Mrs.Srividhya, The District Registrar of Societies, District Registration Office, Saidapet, Chennai – 600 015. 4. D.Magesh, Special Officer, District Registrar, Dindigul. Sub.Aplc.No.741 of 2026 in Cont.P.DR.No.65461 of 2026 14.08.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis