Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010023402026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/362/2026 HANSBIR BETALA SON OF SHRI M. C. BETALA, RESIDENT OF CARE OF MC BETALA AND CO, 1ST FLOOR, SHREE RAM MARKET, CHHATRIBARI, GUWAHATI- 781001, DISTRICT- KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, FINANCEAND TAXATION DEPARTMENT, NEW DELHI.
2:THE JOINT DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF GST INTELLIGENCE 77 RUPKONWAR JYOTI PRASAD AGARWAL ROAD OPP. SRIMANTA SANKARDEVA KALAKSHETRA P.O. PANJABARI GUWAHATI- 781037.
3:THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER GST AND CENTRAL EXCISE COMMISSIONERATE GST BHAWAN KEDAR ROAD MACHKHOWA GUWAHATI.
4:THE ADDITIONAL JOINT COMMISSIONER GST AND CENTRAL EXCISE GST BHAWAN KEDAR ROAD MACHKHOWA GUWAHATI -781001
Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Petitioner : DR. ASHOK SARAF, MR. A. KAUSHIK,B SARMA,MR P K BORA,MR S J SAIKIA,MR. N N DUTTA Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., SC, GST
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA
ORDER 11.02.2026
Heard Mr. NN Dutta, learned counsel for the applicant. This Interlocutory Application has been filed seeking correction in the
order dated 30.01.2026 passed in WP(C) No.436/2026. In the order dated 30.01.2026 passed in WP(C) No.436/2026 certain typographical errors have been crept in inadvertently and the same stand corrected by this order. In paragraph-2 Section 119 and 122(1A) stands corrected, it be read as Section 122(1)(xix) and 122(1A) of the Central Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017. In paragraph-3 instead of Section 122(1A) and 119, it should be read as Section 122(1) (xix), In Paragraph 10 instead of Section 122(1)(xix) and 122(1A) it is seen that
Page No.# 3/3 Section 122 and 119, it should be read as Section 122 (1) (xix) it is seen that Section 122(1)(xix). And in paragraph-11 instead of Section 119, 122(1A), it should be read as Section 122(1A). The order dated 30.01.2026 passed in WP(C) No.436/2026 therefore stands corrected as indicated above. This order should be read together with the order dated 30.01.2026 passed in WP(C) No.436/2026. Accordingly, the Interlocutory Application allowed and stands disposed of. A copy of the order shall be retained in the order dated 436/2026. JUDGE Comparing Assistant