Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 59583 (MAD)

Vignesh v. The State rep by the Inspector of Police

CRL OP/21858/2026 · 2026-08-07

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 21858 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 21858 of 2026 Vignesh ..Petitioner Vs The State represented by its, The Inspector of Police, Dusi Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. Crime No.405/2025. ..Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.405/2025 pending on the file of the Inspector of Police, Dusi Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. For Petitioner: Mr.Neelavathi P For Respondent: Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar Counsel for Government of Tamilnadu (Criminal Side) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 19.06.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 304(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 in Crime No.405 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 21858 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 5 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and the co-accused snatched Rs.2,32,000/- from the tank cover of the defacto complainant's motorcycle and fled on a two-wheeler. Hence, the case. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the alleged occurrence took place on 30.09.2025, whereas the FIR was registered only on 01.10.2025. He further contended that the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 19.06.2026 and is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for the grant of bail. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent, while opposing the grant of bail to the petitioner, reiterated the prosecution case and on instructions, submitted that the petitioner has no bad antecedents and that the stolen property has partially been recovered. 5. I have given anxious consideration to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides, the fact that the alleged occurrence took place in the month of September 2025, the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner since 19.06.2026, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 21858 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 5 the absence of any criminal antecedents and the fact that the stolen property has been partially recovered, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions. 7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-Five Thousand only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Cheyyar, Tiruvannamalai, and subject to the following conditions: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] on breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions had been imposed and the petitioner released on https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 21858 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 5 bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court itself, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [f] if the petitioner thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR may be registered under Section 269 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 07-08-2026 NSL Note: 1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court. 2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To 1. The Judicial Magistrate Court, Cheyyar, Tiruvannamalai. 2. Central Prison, Vellore. 3. The Inspector of Police, Dusi Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. 4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 21858 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 5 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. NSL CRL OP No. 21858 of 2026 07-08-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis