SMT MEDHA KIRIT SOMAIYA v. SANJAY RAJARAM RAUT AND ORS
REVN/222/2026 · 2026-09-01
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5958 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5958 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
47-REVN-222-2026 (CR).doc S.S.Kilaje IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 222 OF 2026 Smt Medha Kirit Somaiya ...Applicant VERSUS Sanjay Rajaram Raut And Anr. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Mr. Nitin Pradhan, Senior Counsel a/w Mr. Laxman Kanal, Ms. Ekta Vinerkar, Mr. Rajshekhar Singh, Ms. Vidhi Yadav, Ms. Diya Kanal and Ms. Ashwini, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. Vikrant Sabne a/w. Mr. Ajay Bhise and Mr. Omkar Shere, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. S. S. Pednekar, APP for the Respondent-State. _________________________________________________________________
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 1st SEPTEMBER, 2026.
P.C. :
1. Heard learned Senior counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for respondent No.1 and learned APP.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondent No.1 raised the issue of maintainability of Revision Application as Appeal should lie against the acquittal order passed by learned Sessions Court.
3. Learned Senior counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the application, with liberty to file appeal.
4. Considering the submission of learned Senior counsel for the applicant, Revision Application is allowed to be withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. If appeal is filed, the issue of limitation shall not be raised as SONALI SATISH KILAJE Digitally signed by SONALI SATISH KILAJE Date: 2026.09.03 13:30:05 +0530
47-REVN-222-2026 (CR).doc S.S.Kilaje Revision Application was pending but respondent No.1 can file appropriate proceeding if he wish to raise any objection.
5. Revision Application is disposed of accordingly. All pending interim Applications, if any, also disposed of.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)