Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:12481] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4595/2026
1. Alka D/o Shri Kishanlal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Ward No. 05, Village Kaseru, Tehsil, Nawalghar, Distirct- Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.
2. Prachi Dixit D/o Shri Vishnu Dixit, Aged About 25 Years, R/o 124/68, Agarwal Farm, Mansarowar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3. Pragti Patidar D/o Amit Kumar Patidar, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Ajad Chok, Boli, District-Sawai Madhopur, Rajastahan.
4. Bhnu Raj Meena S/o Shri Kailash Chand Meena, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village And Post Narayanpur Titwara, District-Sawai Madhopur, Rajastahan. ----Petitioners Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Higher Education, Secretariat, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.).
2. The Commissioner, Collage Education, Block-4, Shiksha Sankul, Jln Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3. The Principal, Govt. Collage, Boli, Sawi Madhopur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sukhdev Singh Solanki For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra K. Takar for Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 25/03/2026
1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioners with following prayer:
“i. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, in the nature thereof, the respondents are directed to
[2026:RJ-JP:12481] (2 of 3) [CW-4595/2026] continue the petitioner as guest faculty under the Vidya Sambal Yojna. ii. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, in the nature thereof, the respondents be directed for the Petitioner's hiring conditions be consider under of the Rajasthan College Education Society (Raj-CES) shall be governed by the Rules of 2023; iii. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, in the nature thereof, the respondents be directed not to replace the petitioners with another set of the contractual employee in the grab of fresh advertisement. iv. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, in the nature thereof, the respondents be directed consider the case of petitioners as par the Hon'ble High Court passed order dated 06/06/2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11232/2025 title as Dr. Arun Meghwal & ors. Versus State of Rajasthan & Ors. was decided the same the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment dated 21.05.2025 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18889/2024 (Dr. Jwala Prasad &Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan &Ors.). V. Any other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the Petitioners. vi. Writ petition filed by the Petitioners may kindly be allowed with costs.”
2.
Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon order dated 06.06.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11232/2025 titled as Dr. Arun Meghwal and Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors., submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur (on the basis of ratio laid down in case of Dr. Jwala Prasad & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18889/2024). He further
[2026:RJ-JP:12481] (3 of 3) [CW-4595/2026] submitted that instant writ petition may be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order.
3. Mr. Jitendra K. Takar for Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG accepts notice on behalf of respondents. Office is directed to reflect name of Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG, as counsel for the respondents.
4. Considered the submissions of learned counsel for parties and also material placed on record.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of ratio laid down in case of Dr. Arun Meghwal and Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) and Dr. Jwala Prasad & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra). The respondents are at liberty to verify veracity of the facts before extending the same benefits to the petitioners.
6. Misc. application, if any, also stands disposed.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/40