Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 59550 (MAD)

THE MANAGEMENT, TAMIL NADU STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION (VIILUPURAM DIVISION) LTD. v. K R Krishna Murthy

REV.APPL/182/2026 · 2026-08-13

P Dhanabal, S M Subramaniam

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

REV.APPL No. 182 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL REV.APPL No.182 of 2026 The Management, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram Division) Ltd., Rep. by its General Manager, Villupuram Region, Villupuram -605 602. … Applicant -vs- 1. K.R.Krishna Murthy 2. The Special Joint Commissioner of Labour, Chennai – 600 006. … Respondents Prayer: Application filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 & 2 r/w Section 114 of CPC, to review the order dated 29.04.2024 passed in W.A.No.631 of 2024. For Applicant: Mr.M.Aswini For Ms.S Pavithra For Respondents: Mr.T.Deeraj For M/s.P.V.Law Associates for R1 Ms.RK.Sekina Reshma, AGP for R2 ***** O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam,J.) The present Review Application has been filed to review the order dated 29.04.2024 passed in W.A.No.631of 2024. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis REV.APPL No. 182 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 2. Learned counsel for Review Applicant would contend that the scope of Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 had been duly complied with before removal of employee from service, which has not been taken into consideration by this Court in Writ Appeal. 3. May that as it be, in any event re-adjudication of merits in a Review Application is impermissible. Scope and ambit of Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC cannot be expanded for re-adjudication or re-appreciation of facts. Furthermore, ground for appeal cannot be construed as a ground for reviewing the order of this Court. If at all facts were not considered, parties have to seek for appropriate remedy. 4. In the present case, Review Applicant has not established any error apparent warranting exercise of review jurisdiction. Wrong appreciation of facts would not constitute a ground for reviewing the order. Consequently, the present Review Application is dismissed. No costs. (S.M.S.,J.) (P.D.B.,J.) 13-08-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No AR https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis REV.APPL No. 182 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 To: The Special Joint Commissioner of Labour, Chennai – 600 006. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis REV.APPL No. 182 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J. AND P.DHANABAL,J. AR REV.APPL No.182 of 2026 13-08-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis