[251] District Ma Umro @ A Coram : Present: PANKAJ J [1] Order date despite serv [2] that in term the appella to the claim [3] [4] disposed of 04.05.2026 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT CHANDIGA FAO-6766 Date of De ict Manager, HAFED, Kaithal o @ Amro Devi and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PA Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advo Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Siddharth Gulati, Advocat None for respondent No.2, des **** KAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) The appeal against the claiman r dated 07.11.2017. None appears o ite service. In view thereof, the impugned in terms of Section 12 of the Employ ppellant shall be at liberty to recover e claimant from the contractor. Disposed off accordingly. All pending miscellaneous ed off. .2026 Whether speaking/ reasoned T OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA DIGARH 6766-2017 (O&M) of Decision : 04.05.2026 …Appellant versus ….Respondents PANKAJ JAIN Advocate with Ms. Parul Saini, dvocate for respondent No.1. despite service. laimant already stands dismissed vide pears on behalf of respondent No.2, ugned order is modified to the extent mployees’ Compensation Act, 1923 cover the compensation amount paid eous application(s), if any, stands (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No vide No.2, extent 1923, t paid tands RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.05.08 18:37 I agree to specified portions of this document