Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5950 (CHH)

DR. HEMANT KUMAR MINJ v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/2987/2026 · 2026-04-06

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:15734 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2987 of 2026 1 - Dr. Hemant Kumar Minj S/o Shri A.N. Minj Aged About 41 Years Post Ayush Medical Officer, (Male) R/o Doctors, Quarter In Front Of C.M. And H.O. Office, Jashpur, District- Jashpur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Public Health And Family Welfare, Ministry , Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director, Directorate Of Health Services , Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Mission Director, National Health And Family Welfare, Swasthya Bhavan, Third And Fourth Floor, Sector- 19, New Raipur Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Deputy Director, National Bal Swasthya Karyakram (Chirayu) Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.) 5 - Collector, Jashpurnagar Jashpur, District- Jashpur (C.G.) 6 - Chief Medical And Health Officer, Jashpurnagar Jashpur, District- Jashpur (C.G.) 7 - District Level Officer, Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram Nhm, District- Jashpur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from CIS) For Petitioner :Mr. Alok Kumar Dewangan, Advocate For Respondents-State :Ms. Shakshi Bajpayee, Panel Lawyer For Respondents No.3, 4 & 7 :Mr. C. Jayant K. Rao, Advocate RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2026.04.15 16:41:28 +0530 2 SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 07/04/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the very outset submits that the petitioner at this stage is not pressing this writ petition on merit only seeking direction to respondent No.3 to consider and to take decision on the representation dated 02.06.2025 at the earliest within specified time frame. 2. Learned State counsel submits that as petitioner is not pressing this petition on merits and only seeking a direction to consider and take decision on the representation, he is having no objection to the limited prayer made. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 4. On due consideration of the submission made by learned counsel for the respective parties, nature of grievance raised by the petitioner that the representation submitted has not been decided, the writ petition at this stage is disposed of directing the respondents No.3 to consider and take decision on the representation submitted by the petitioners in accordance with law, expeditiously, within further period of 3 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition stands finally disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Ravi Mandavi