Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 595 (ALL)

NASIR AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

WRIC/10139/2026 · 2026-03-17

Prakash Padia

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 10139 of 2026 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-State and perused the record. 2. The basic relief sought by the petitioner in the present petition is to direct the respondent no.2-Tehsildar (Judicial), Bilari, Moradabad to decide restoration application/recall No.7104 of 2023, Computer Case No.T202313540207104 expeditiously. 3. It is argued by counsel for the petitioner that though a considerable time has already been lapsed but till date no final decision has been taken in the matter. 4. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the present petition is disposed of directing the court concerned to decide the aforesaid application strictly in accordance with law most expeditiously and preferably within a period of three months but without granting unnecessary adjournment unless there is no legal impediment. March 18, 2026 Pramod Tripathi Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay Dube, Ved Prakash Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Prakash Padia,J.) Nasir Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRAMOD TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- PRAMOD TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad