Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5942 (UTT)

DAN SINGH BISHT v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ABA/178/2026 · 2026-05-26

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:4158 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL No. 178 of 2026 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. M.S. Pal Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Amit Kapri and Mr. Pankaj Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Tumul Nainwal, learned A.G.A for the State. 3. Learned Senior counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the instant anticipatory bail application with liberty to file a writ petition for quashing of FIR. 4. Permission, as sought for, is granted. 5. The State counsel has no objection to it. 6. In such view of the matter, the instant anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to file as above. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 26.05.2026 Nahid 2026:UHC:4158