Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 59413 (MAD)

SULAIMAN @ RAHMAN KHAN v. The State Rep. by, The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/21594/2026 · 2026-08-06

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 21594 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 21594 of 2026 1. Sulaiman @ Rahman Khan S/o. Ahmed Khan, Anna Street, Gandhi Nagar, Virudhampet, Vellore District. Tamil Nadu. 2. Siddiq @ Siddiq Khan S/o. Ahmed Khan, Anna Street, Gandhi Nagar, Virudhampet, Vellore District. Tamil Nadu. 3. Usman S/o. Musthafa, Anna Street, Gandhi Nagar, Virudhampet, Vellore District. Tamil Nadu. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep. by, The Inspector of Police Viruthampet Police Station, Vellore District. Tamil Nadu. Crime No.101 of 2026. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the Petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Cr.No.101 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): MR. NIRMAL KRISHNAN For Respondent(s): MS.R.S.INDIRA, GOVT.ADVOCATE (CRL.SIDE) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 21594 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 5 ORDER The petitioners apprehend arrest for the alleged offences under Sections 296(b), 118(1), 78 of BNS, 2023 in Crime No.101 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that, due to previous enmity, the petitioner attacked the defacto complainant using hands, causing grievous injuries and abused him in filthy language. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated and that they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the co-accused has already been released on bail by this Court in Crl.OP.No.21093 of 2026 dated 03.08.2026. Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 4. Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and, upon instructions, submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents. Hence, she opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. I have given my anxious consideration to either side submissions. 6. Considering the totality of the circumstances of the case and the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, the petitioner has no https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 21594 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 5 criminal antecedents and that the co-accused has already been released on bail, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail with certain conditions. 7. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Vellore on condition that the petitioners shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further conditions: (a) If the petitioners fails to surrender before the concerned learned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled; (b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity; (c) The petitioners shall report before the respondent Police, daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation; (d) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 21594 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 5 conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; (e) If the petitioners thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS Act. 06-08-2026 DRL To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.III, Vellore. 2.The Inspector of Police Viruthampet Police Station, Vellore District. Tamil Nadu. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 21594 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 5 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. DRL CRL OP No. 21594 of 2026 06-08-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis