Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5939 (HP)

NAGU RAM v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/7051/2024 · 2026-05-05

Ajay Mohan Goel

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:HHC:14632 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 7051 of 2024 Decided on: 05.05.2026 Nagu Ram …….Petitioner Versus State of HP and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Vijay Singh Bhatia, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rajpal Thakur, Advocate General for respondents –State. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has inter alia prayed for the following reliefs:- “i) That writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued, directing the respondents to give the all consequential benefits pertaining to the age of superannuation at attaining the age of 60 years on 31.12.2018 instead of 31.12.2016. Further the respondents may be directed to count the service render by the petitioner as part time from July 1988 to June 2004, and daily wages services from-June 2004 to December 2011 and regular service from 01.01.2012 to 31.12.2018 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits. The entire record of the present case may kindly be summoned for the kind perusal of 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:14632 this Hon'ble Court.” In light of the fact that the issue raised by the petitioner in this petition is pending adjudication before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, as agreed, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the parties shall abide by the final judgment passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Satya Devi’s case. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge May 05, 2026 (narender)