Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5937 (JHR)

SANJEEV KUMAR v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1907/2026 · 2026-04-10

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:10306 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1907 of 2026 Sanjeev Kumar, son of Vijay Sharma … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Ms. Kehkashan Afsheen, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shailesh Kr. Sinha, Advocate --- 07/10th April 2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Ranchi Kotwali P.S. Case No. 175/2025 for the offence registered under Section 318 (4), 319 (2), 336 (3), 338, 340 (2), 317(5), 317(4) 3(5) of B.N.S & Section 66(C), 66(D) of I.T. Act, now said to have been pending in the court of learned C.J.M., Ranchi. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 09.07.2025 in connection with the alleged offence having no criminal antecedent. He submits that the co-accused, namely, Deepak Kumar Himanshu has been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in B.A. No. 9830 of 2025 vide order dated 20.12.2025. He submits that no victim has come forward. 3. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer and has submitted that supplementary investigation and investigation against the co- accused is going on. However, he does not dispute the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the custody of the petitioner since 09.07.2025, the petitioner is directed to be enlarge on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Ranchi in connection with Ranchi Kotwali P.S. Case No. 175/2025, subject to the following conditions: - 2026:JHHC:10306 2 (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner would deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his Mobile Number before the learned court below, which he shall not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 5. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 6. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e- mail/FAX’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 10.04.2026 Uploaded On: 13.04.2026 Mukul/-