Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5933 (UTT)

HARISH NAUDIYAL v. VEER MADHO SINGH BHANDARI UTTARAKHAND TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY

WPSS/1252/2026 · 2026-05-25

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:4101 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS/1252/2026 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Retuparna Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Tilak Ram Sharma, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Shailendra Naudiyal, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 & 3. 3. Mr. Rajendra Arya, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Neeraj Garg, Advocate for respondent nos. 2 & 4. 4. Petitioner was engaged on contract through UPNL in Veer Madho Singh Bhandari Uttarakhand Technical University for discharging duties as Group-D employee, allegedly in 2014. According to petitioner, he developed some medical conditions, due to which, he could not attend to his duties after August, 2024. 5. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought a direction to the competent authority to permit him to join duties as Peon/Anusewak in the University. 6. Learned counsel appearing for UPNL submits that petitioner absented from duties without any intimation or information to the University concerned. Learned counsels for the respondents submit that if petitioner is interested in resuming duties, then he can approach the competent authority by making representation. 2026:UHC:4101 7. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of by permitting petitioner to make representation before the Registrar of the concerned University. If he makes representation, Registrar shall take decision thereupon, as per law, within four weeks thereafter. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 25.05.2026 Navin