Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5933 (AP)

SRI VIGNESWARA COSNTRUCTIONS v. S. SURESH KUMAR, IAS

CC/3457/2025 · 2026-07-20

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010605672025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY, THE 21st DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3457/2025 Between: 1. SRI VIGNESWARA COSNTRUCTIONS, REP.BY. MANAGING PARTNERV. SURESH REDDY, S/O V.RAMANJANEYA REDDY, AGED 36 YEARS, D.NO.25-27, SANJEEVA NAGAR, NANDYALA, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. S SURESH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. 2. SRI J SRINIVAS, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER-1, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. SRI SRINIVASA REDDY L/C, THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (WORKS), MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. SRI DHYANACHANDRA H M IAS, COMMISSIONER, VIJAYAWADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. SRI P SATYA KUMAR L/C, THE CHIEF ENGINEER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents/Contemnors for wilful disobedience of the Orders dated 29.08.2025 of this Hon'ble Court made in WP No.22547 of 2025 in terms of Sections 10 to 12 of the of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to DISPENSE WITH certified copy of the orders of the Hon’ble court passed in W.P 22547 of 2025, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to dispense with the personal appearance of the 4th Respondent i.e., Dhyanachandra H M, Commissioner, Vijayawada Municipal Corporation, on 06.07.2026 as directed by this Honble Court vide order dated 15.06.2026 in C.C.No.3457 of 2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. GORANTLA MALLESWARA REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. KOTHARU VIJAYESWARI 3. The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE No.3457 OF 2025 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.22547 of 2025, dated 29.08.2025has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case. 2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case. 3. Recording the same, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:21.07.2026 KGM Whether the order is: Speaking Reasoned ☑ Reportable Non-reportable ☑ 89 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE No.3457 of 2026 Date: 21.07.2026 KGM