Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5930 (KAR)

SATHISH KUMAR v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY

CRL.P/4492/2025 · 2026-04-10

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20053 CRL.P No. 4492 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4492 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SATHISH KUMAR S/O MANSIGH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT GOSHALA ROAD, SATHIVALA MANDIR, NO.2, MOH PANSARIYAN, SHAMLI TALUK, SANGLI, UTTAR PRADESH - 247 776. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MOHAMMED UMMAR FAROOQ, ADVOCATE) AND: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY TIPTUR TOWN POLICE STATION, TUMKUR, REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT COMPLEX, BANGALORE - 560 001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. K. NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 439 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 483 OF BNSS) PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN S.C.NO.10055/2024 (CRIME NO.175/2024) OF RESPONDENT TIPTUR TOWN POLICE STATION POLICE FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S.312 R/W 3(5) OF BHARATHIYA NYANA SANHITA (BNS) PENDING ON TEH FILE BEFORE V ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT TUMKUR (SITTING AT TIPTUR). Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20053 CRL.P No. 4492 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER None appears for the petitioner. Even on the last date of hearing also there was no representation. 2. Petitioner is the accused who is in custody in respect of offence punishable under Sections 312 (3) (5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in S.C.No.10055/2024 arising out of Crime No.175/2024. 3. A bail petition came to be filed on 21.03.2025. Since one year the matter is not progressing. Order sheet discloses that the matter is pending on account of learned counsel for the petitioner is not showing interest in proceedings of the case. Particularly, on every date of hearing either time is prayed or there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE BVK; List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1