Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5930 (BOM)

MANMEET SANTOSH SHETTY v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

WP/2486/2026 · 2026-08-31

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Sbw 9-WP-2486-2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2486 OF 2026 Manmeet Santosh Shetty … Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents Mr. Chaitanya Malgaonkar for the Petitioner. Smt. Madhavi H. Mhatre, APP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND KAMAL KHATA, JJ. DATE : 31st August, 2026 P.C.:- 1) Investigation of crime bearing No.79 of 2023 is sought to be transferred by the Informant only on the ground that, a photocopy of a document (page 30) is annexed to the supplementary charge-sheet. Various redundant arguments are advanced across the bar with which we are not impressed. 2) According to us, the investigation as carried out by the Investigating Agency is proper. The learned Magistrate at the time of trial may call for the original document from the concerned Authority, 1/2 SANDHYA BHAGU WADHWA Digitally signed by SANDHYA BHAGU WADHWA Date: 2026.09.02 19:53:16 +0530 Sbw 9-WP-2486-2026.doc 3) In view of the above, we are of the opinion that, there are no merits in the Petition. 4) Petition is accordingly dismissed. (KAMAL KHATA, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.) 2/2