HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 34705 of 2026 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J. Heard Sri Ramesh Chandra Yadav, learned counsel for the applicants, Shri Puspraj Singh, learned Brief Holder for the State and perused the material on record. The present application under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the applicant to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 5946 of 2025 (State Vs. Anil and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 276 of 2023, under Sections 323, 504, 506 of I.P.C., Police Station- Gambhirpur, District- Azamgarh as well as cognizance/summoning order dated 5.2.2025, pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 15, Azamgarh. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicants were not arrested during the course of investigation and the charge-sheet have been submitted against them. It is further submitted that the offence is punishable up to 7 years imprisonment. Upon considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants is, hereby, refused. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicants wants to withdraw the application with liberty to file a regular bail application before the court of competent jurisdiction. In case bail application is filed by the learned counsel for the applicants, Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manoj Kumar, Ramesh Chandra Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Anil And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) the same shall be decided in the light of the observations made in the judgment rendered by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2022) 10 SCC 51, wherein the Supreme Court considering the category(A) as mentioned in the paragraph no. 2, bail applications of such accused against which charge-sheet has been submitted on appearance may be decided without the accused being taken in physical custody or by granting interim bail till the bail application is decided. It has been observed that at the cost of repetition, we wish to state that, in category A, one would expect a better exercise of discretion on the part of the court in favour of the accused. The application stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. September 9, 2026 KJ NA528 No. 34705 of 2026 2 (Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.) Digitally signed by :- KAMARJAHAN ANSARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad