[2026:JHHC:10677] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.1425 of 2026 ------ Rabiul Islam @ Mota @ Raviul Islam aged about 35 years, Son of Md. Abu Talib @ Md. Talif, Resident of Rajabandh Saraikella, P.O. & P.S.- Saraikella, District- Saraikella Kharsawan (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Shailesh Kr. Singh, Advocate Mr. Abhijeet Kr. Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Saket Kumar, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.04 Dated-15-04-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Dhanbad P.S. Case No.441 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. Case No.383 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 103(1), 61(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Section 27 of Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons and in criminal conspiracy with them, has committed the murder of Md. Sahabuddin Siddiqui. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused person and he is not named in the FIR. It is then submitted that without putting the petitioner on T.I. Parade as mentioned in paragraph No.08 of the bail application, charge sheet has already been submitted against the petitioner on 04.03.2026. It is next submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 08.04.2026 passed in B.A. No.2491 of 2026. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 30.09.2025 as has been mentioned in para-13 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad in connection with Dhanbad P.S. Case No.441 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. Case No.383 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-15.04.2026-Animesh/