M.Arulselvam v. The State Rep. by, The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/20383/2026 · 2026-07-29
D Bharatha Chakravarthy
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 59227 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 59227 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 20383 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL OP No. 20383 of 2026 and Crl.MP.Nos. 13607 & 13608 of 2026
1. M.Arulselvam, S/o. Mannakatti, No.80, SS Nagar, P N Palayam, Perumalnaickenpalayam, Cuddalore-607104. 2. M.Sakthivel, S/o. Mannakatti, No.84, Saidu Kalvay Street, S.S.Nagar, PN Palyam, Melpattampakkam, Cuddalore-607104. 3. M.Prammamoorthi S/o. Mannakatti, No.3, Saidu Kalvay Street, S.S.Nagar, P N Palayam, Melpattampakkam, Cuddalore-607104. ..Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The State Rep. by, The Inspector of Police Nellikuppam Police Station, Cuddalore District. Crime No.419 of 2024. 2. S.Neslin S/o. Subramani, No.3, Saidu Kalvay Street, S.S.Nagar, P N Palayam, Melpattampakkam, Cuddalore-607104. ..Respondent(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 20383 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS Act, 2023, to call for the records in pertaining to the in CC.No.232 of 2026 on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Cuddalore and quash the same and pass such further or others as this Honble Court may deem fit and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Senthamizhan For Respondent(s):
MR.M.MOHAMED RIYAZ GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE (CRIMINAL SIDE) for R1 ORDER The prayer in the Criminal Original Petition is to quash the final report in C.C.No.232 of 2026 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Cuddalore. 2. Upon considering the same, the allegation is that when the accused and the de facto complainant side had got previous enmity, while the work was being carried on as a Contractor, the accused had interfered into the same and also said to have attacked the de facto complainant with iron when the allegation with reference to grievous injury is made and the same is supported by materials such as examination of the Doctor, wound certificate etc. This is not a case where the Court can take the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners as correct and quash the very case. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 20383 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4
3. Therefore, keeping open the liberty of the petitioners to raise all the grounds before the Trial Court, the Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 4. At this stage, the learned counsel pleads hardship for the petitioners to attend the Trial Court.
Considering the hardship pleaded, the presence of the petitioners before the Trial Court stands dispensed with, except for such necessary hearings as may be insisted by the Trial Court. Accordingly, Crl.MP.No. 13608 of 2026 is ordered. 29-07-2026 Neutral Citation: No KKN To
1. The Inspector of Police, Nellikuppam Police Station, Cuddalore District. 2. The learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Cuddalore. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 20383 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. KKN CRL OP No. 20383 of 2026 29-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis