Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5922 (JHR)

SHYAM NARAYAN PANDEY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.A(SJ)/28/2024 · 2026-04-15

Rajesh Kumar

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:10635 1 Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 28 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 28 of 2024 1.Shyam Narayan Pandey, aged about 83 years, 2.Sheo Narayan Pandey @ Shiv Narayan Pandey, aged about 73 years, Both sons of Late Suryadeo Narayan Pandey, 3.Rajeev Kumar Pandey @ Guddu, aged about 49 years, Son of Late Buddhi Narayan Pandey, 4.Arun Kumar Pandey, aged about 51 years, Son of Sheo Narayan Pandey, 5.Deepak Kumar Pandey, aged about 30 years, Son of Arun Kumar Pandey, 6.Rahul Pandey @ Rahul Kr. Pandey, aged about 26 years, Son of Sanjay Pandey, 7.Sanjay Pandey @ Sanjay Kr. Pandey, aged about 47 years, Son of Late Buddhi Narayan Pandey, 8.Shambhu Pandey @ Shambhunath Pandey, aged about 63 years, Son of Ramashay Pandey, No.1 to 8 all are Resident of Village-Shivpur, P.O.- Shivpur, P.S. - Kandi, District-Garhwa. 9.Awadh Kishor Pandey, aged about 26 years, Son of Shambhu Pandey @ Shambhunath Pandey, Resident of Village- Pipardih, P.O. & P.S.- Kandi, District- Garhwa. …....... Appellant(s) Vrs. 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Sunil Ram, Son of Late Ganga Ram, Resident of Village- Shivpur, P.O.- Shivpur, P.S.-Kandi, Dist. - Garhwa ........ Respondent(s) ….... CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Pankaj Srivastava, Advocate Ms. Anushka Swadha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwari, A.P.P. For the Resp. No.2 : Mr. Suraj Singh, Advocate 18/15.04.2026 The present appeal has been filed under Section 14 (A) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015. 2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the State as well as learned counsel for the respondent no.2. 3. The present criminal appeal is directed against the order dated 01.05.2023 passed in Complaint Case No. 67 of 2020 by the court of learned Special Judge SC/ST Act -cum-Additional Sessions Judge-I, Garhwa whereby cognizance has been taken against the appellants under Sections 341 & 323 of the IPC and Section 3(1)(g)(r)(s) of the SC/ST Act and they have been summoned to appear before the Trial Court. 2026:JHHC:10635 2 Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 28 of 2024 4. Although the appeal is maintainable, but learned counsel for the appellants seeks to withdraw the present appeal with a liberty to the appellants to work out their remedy in accordance with law as several provisions are there to challenge before framing of the charge or for alteration of the charge. 5. Permission is accorded. 6. With the aforesaid liberty, the present appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) 15.04.2026 A. Mohanty/Raja Uploaded ____/____/2026