IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3228 of 2026 ====================================================== Krishna Giri S/o Late Kapildev Giri, R/V Mahendvar P.O. Pahriya, P.S. Bhagwanpur, District Kaimur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through District Magistrate cum Collector, Kaimur at Bhabua Govt. of Bihar. 2. The Additional Collector Kaimur cum Additional District Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua. 3. The Deputy Commissioner Land and Revenue, Bhabua. 4. The Circle Officer, Bhagwanpur, Kaimur. 5. Kunj Bihari Giri, S/o Late Kapildev Giri, R/village-Mahendvar, P.O.- Pahriya, P.S. Bhagwanpur, District Kaimur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rakesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Abbas Haider, SC-6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 28-04-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s: (i) for issuance of appropriate writ/ writs in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 20.01.2026 passed by the Additional District Magistrate Kaimur vide MR-120/2025- 26 in mutation revision case where in the learned revenue court has set aside the order of DCLR, Bhabua bearing MA no. 573/2024-25 on the erroneous ground; (ii) for issuance of the writ prohibiting the authorities including the private respondent no- 05 to restraint to any changes/alienation in the Patna High Court CWJC No.3228 of 2026(3) dt.28-04-2026 2/2 nature of land in question pertaining to the effect of the order/orders; till the pendency of this writ application; (iii) for issuance of the further writ to restoring the earlier old jambandi (mutation) which was created in the name of the father namely Lt. Kapildev Giri of the present writ petitioner; (iv) for providing reliefs/ relives as it found suitable to the petitioner under the fact and circumstances of the case. 3. It has been informed by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the sole petitioner is no more and as such the writ petition stands abated. However, be granted to the heirs to challenge the order. 4. Granting said liberty to the heirs of the sole petitioner who is no more, the writ petition is disposed of. Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U