U.SAMSU THABREJ SAHIB KHALIFATUAL QADORO BC IT v. The Chief Executive officer
WP/29615/2026 · 2026-07-29
Krishnan Ramasamy
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 59197 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 59197 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 29615 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 29615 of 2026 U.Samsu Thabrej Sahib Khalifatual Qadoro Bc It Hereditary khalifa -Haji Hadi Noor shaib Taikal 33, Khalifa sahib street Nagapattinam District Nagore-611 002 ..Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The Chief Executive officer Tamilnadu waqf board Jafar sirang street Mannadi Vallal seethakadi Nagar chennai-600 001
2. The Inspector of Tamilnadu waqf Board Thanjavur office Eidgah Moque Railway colony Thanjavur ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to appoint qualified Muthavallis for Nagore Noor sahib Taikal waqf, G.S.No.235/Thanjavur For Petitioner(s): Mr.G.Anandaraj For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Abdul Mubeen, St. counsel https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 29615 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 Order This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 01.05.2025. 2. Mr.R.Abdul Mubeen, learned Standing counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed a representation dated 01.05.2025 before the respondents, requesting them appoint qualified Muthavallis for Nagore Noor Sahib Taikal Waqf. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the respondents till date. Hence, this petition. 5. In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner’s representation is not available with them. Hence, he requests this Court to direct the petitioner to file a fresh representation, so as to consider and dispose of the same within a period of 12 weeks. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 29615 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4
6. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record. 7. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the respondents. In such case, the respondents shall consider the petitioner’s representation and after issuing notice to all the concerned parties, dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
8. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 29-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No nsa To
1. The Chief Executive officer Tamilnadu waqf board Jafar sirang street Mannadi Vallal seethakadi Nagar chennai-600 001
2. The Inspector of Tamilnadu waqf Board Thanjavur office Eidgah Moque Railway colony Thanjavur https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 29615 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. nsa WP No. 29615 of 2026 29-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis