- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1794 WP No. 109300 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA WRIT PETITION NO. 109300 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. CHANDRA SHEKHAR D.M. S/O SEVYA NAIK AGE 46 YEARS, OCC. FARMER R/O. MUDLAPURA, HOSATHANDA VILL AND PO. SOVINAHALLI TQ. HARAPANAHALLI DIST. VIJAYANAGARA 583214. 2. VISHWANATHA CHAVADIHINDLA S/O NAGAPPA AGE 39 YEARS, OCC. FARMER R/O. 33, 4TH WARD, NEVVARA ONI, VILL AND P. UTTANGI, GADAGALLI DIST. VIJAYANGAR 583219. 3. GANESH H. S/O H. BASAVARAJA AGE 43 YEARS, OCC. FARMER R/O. HARAPANAHALLI ROAD, NEAR SAMUDAYA BHAVANA, TQ. HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI DIST. VIJAYANAGARA 583212. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. KIRAN M. GOLI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY HADAGALI POLICE STATION, HADAGALI 586127. 2. G. PARAMESHWARA S/O GANGANNA AGE 46 YEARS, OCC. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE R/O. E.O AT HADAGALI TALUK PANCHAYAT, HADAGALI TOWN, DIST. VIJAYNAGARA 586127. Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench. - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1794 WP No. 109300 of 2025 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, R/W. U/S 528 OF BNSS, PRAYING TO, ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING IMPUGNED F.I.R. NO. 130/2025 DATED 12/09/2025 IN HADAGALI P. S. REGISTERING CRIMINAL CASE AGAINST PETITIONERS WHO ARE ARRAYED AS ACCUSED NO. 01, 04, AND 05 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 189(2), 191(3), 352, 351, 351(1), 132, 190 OF BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 VIDE ANNEXURE A AND A1 IN SO FAR AS PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) 1. Learned High Court Government Pleader has filed a memo along with charge sheet. 2. In view of the filing of the charge sheet, the present petition has rendered infructuous, as only the FIR was challenged. 3. Moreover, the process fee has also not been paid for issuance of notice to respondent No.2. 4. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed as rendered infructuous. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE RHR/-Ct-cmu LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 13