Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5909 (BOM)

Pradeep Kumar Shivnath Yadav v. State of Maharashtra

WP/382/2026 · 2026-09-01

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

82WP-382-2026 GRP.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.382 OF 2026 Pradeep Kumar Shivnath Yadav. ...Petitioner vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO.785 OF 2026 Anilkumar Lalmani Yadav ...Petitioner vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO.3023 OF 2026 Vandana Ashokkumar Yadav ...Petitioner vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents _______ Mr. Samarth Moray with Abhishek Jani i/b. Shivani Shinde, for Petitioners. Ms. Pushpa Yadav, for Respondent / BMC. Mr. S. B. Gore, AGP for the State in WP 382/26. Mr. Rakesh Pathak, AGP for the State in WP 785/26. Mr. Suraj Gupte, AGP for the State in WP 3023/26 Mr. Sagar Amrut Rane, for Respondent Nos.7& 8. _________ CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI & Dr.NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATE: 01 September 2026. P.C. 1. We are informed by learned counsel for the petitioners that during the pendency of these petitions, the proposal has been rejected. 2. In this view of the matter, we are of the opinion that the petitioners, if aggrieved, are required to file fresh petitions. Thus, keeping open all contentions of the parties, we dispose of these petitions with liberty to adopt appropriate remedy as may be available in law. 3. Disposed of. No costs. (Dr.NEELA GOKHALE, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.) 1 September 2026 P.V.Rane PRASHANT VILAS RANE Digitally signed by PRASHANT VILAS RANE Date: 2026.09.03 19:48:03 +0530