WP No. 30094 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 30094 of 2026 Brammadesam Sri Kalyana Varadhar Temple Trust Sri Kalyana Vardhar Temple Rep by its president, Mr.S.Raghu Brammadesam, Vembakkam Taluk Tiruvannamalai District -632 511 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Tahsildar vembakkam Taluk office Vembakkam Tiruvannamalai District 2. The Land Surveyor Vembakkam Taluk Tiruvannamalai District 3. Village Administrative officer Brahmadesam Village Vembakkam Taluk Tirvannamalai District ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent with the assistance of Respondents 2 and 3 to consider and dispose of the petitioners Representation dated 6.7.2026 on merits and in accordance with law, by conducting a proper field re-survey and demarcation of the temple property in S.No.817/1B at Brahmadesam village, if necessary with police protection within a strictly stipulated time frame before the Maha Samprokshanam scheduled on 23.8.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 30094 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 6 For Petitioner(s): Ms.S.Radhika For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, Govt. counsel Order This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 06.07.2026. 2. Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, survey was already conducted at the subject land on 10.06.2026. However, the boundaries were not earmarked. Hence, a fresh application was made for conducting re-survey at the subject land by using DGPS method. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the respondents till date. Hence, this petition. 5. In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner’s representation will be disposed of within a period of 2 weeks and hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 30094 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 6 6. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record. 7. In the case on hand, survey was already conducted at the subject land on 10.06.2026. However, the boundaries were not earmarked. Hence, a fresh representation was made for conducting re-survey at the subject land by using DGPS method. Normally, this Court will not entertain any petition, filed for a direction to re-survey the subject land. However, in this case, though the survey was conducted, no boundary stones were laid at the subject land. In such case, this Court is inclined to issue a direction to re-survey the said property. 8. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the 1st & 2nd respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 06.07.2026 and after issuing notice to all the concerned parties, including the adjacent land owners, dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 2 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and thereafter, conduct re-survey at the subject property, preferably by way of DGPS (Differential Global Positioning System). After the completion of survey, the official respondents shall lay the boundary stones and provide the coordinates to the petitioner. The cost, pertaining to the process of re-survey, shall be borne by the petitioner. If there is any https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 30094 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 6 encroachment by the 3rd parties at the subject land, it is up to the petitioner to remove them. 8. It is made clear that this order is passed only for the purpose of issuing a direction to the official respondent for conducting survey and laying boundary stones at the subject land. If there is any dispute with regard to the title/possession over the said property, the same has to be decided only by way of filing a suit before an appropriate Civil Court. 9. If any police protection is required at the time of conducting survey, the revenue officials are granted liberty to avail the same by approaching the jurisdictional police station. In such case, the concerned police officer shall provide all necessary protection to the revenue officials till the completion of survey at the subject land. 10. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 29-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No nsa https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 30094 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 6 To 1. The Tahsildar vembakkam Taluk office Vembakkam Tiruvannamalai District 2. The Land Surveyor Vembakkam Taluk Tiruvannamalai District 3. Village Administrative officer Brahmadesam Village Vembakkam Taluk Tirvannamalai District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 30094 of 2026 __________ Page6 of 6 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. nsa WP No. 30094 of 2026 29-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis