CRL OP No. 20484 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 20484 of 2026 K.Ajithkumar ..Petitioner(s) Vs State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Brammadesam Police Station, Villupuram District. Crime No.0279/2024 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023 To enlarge the Petitioner onbail n the event of arrest by the Respondent Police in connection with Crime No.0279/2024 on the file of the Respondent Police, and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): M/s.S.Sugumar For Respondent(s): MS.R.S.INDIRA, GOVT.ADVOCATE (CRL.SIDE) ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Section o 379 of IPC, Crime No. 0279/2024 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 20484 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner involved in alleged theft of two wheeler bearing registration No.TN 02 BB 4740. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case and that he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the Petitioners. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the Respondent Police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that two previous cases were pending against the petitioner which are similar in nature. Hence, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. I have given my anxious consideration to either side submissions and perused the materials available on record. 6. From the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), it is seen that the petitioner has got two previous cases of similar nature, which https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 20484 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 clearly demonstrates that whenever he was granted anticipatory bail by the Courts, he has misused the liberty granted to him. In view of the same, if the petitioner is enlarged on anticipatory bail, he may be emboldened to indulge in similar offences in future without fear of law. Hence, taking into consideration of interest of the society at large, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. 7.Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands dismissed. 29-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No NR To: 1. The Judicial Magistrate-II, Tindivanam. 2. The Inspector of Police, Brammadesam Police Station, Villupuram District. 3. The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 20484 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. NR CRL OP No. 20484 of 2026 29-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis