Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 59057 (MAD)

Sundararaj v. The State Rep. by, The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/20355/2026 · 2026-07-29

D Bharatha Chakravarthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 20355 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL OP No. 20355 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.Nos.13566 & 13567 of 2026 Sundararaj S/o. Chandran, No.160, Perumal Koil Street, Pullarampakkam Village, Tiruvallur Taluk and District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State Rep. by, The Inspector of Police Central Crime Bureau, Egmore, Chennai-8. Crime No.5 of 2010. 2. R.Jayakumar S/o. Renganathan, No.17, Periya Palayathamman Koil Street, Sembiyam, Perambur, Chennai-600 011. ..Respondent(s) Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, praying to call for the entire records concerned in CC.No.5605 of 2023 on the file of the Metropolitan Magistrate CCB/CBCID, Egmore,Chennai-8 and quash the same in so far as the petitioner is concerned. For Petitioner(s): Ms.S.Pavithra for Mr.C.Prakasam For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for R1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 20355 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER The prayer in this Criminal Original Petition is to quash the C.C.No.5605 of 2023 on the file of the Metropolitan Magistrate CCB/CBCID, Egmore, Chennai-8. 2. The crux of allegations is that property belongs to the de-facto complainant was tried to be dealt with by impersonation and thereafter by creating false documents. This petition is filed by the petitioner who is arrayed as accused No.3. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that except for being a document writer for preparing the document, no allegation is there as against the petitioner/accused. 4. In reply thereafter, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the petitioner had also stood as a witness in the power of attorney wherein he has identified the impersonator. 5. In view thereof, it cannot be said that there is no material at all to proceed against the petitioner. Therefore, keeping open the liberty of the petitioner to raise all grounds before the criminal Court, this Criminal Original https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 20355 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 Petition stands dismissed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 6. Considering the hardship that is pleaded by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the presence of the petitioner before the trial Court shall stands dispensed with except for the hearing that may be insisted upon by the trial Court. 29-07-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No DP To 1. The Metropolitan Magistrate CCB/CBCID, Egmore, Chennai-8. 2. The Inspector of Police Central Crime Bureau, Egmore, Chennai-8. 3. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 20355 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. DP CRL OP No. 20355 of 2026 29-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis