Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5904 (AP)

Podiyam Rengu Bheema v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/5643/2026 · 2026-07-16

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010350362026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY, THE 17th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5643/2026 Between: 1. PODIYAM RENGU BHEEMA, S/O SOMA, AGED ABOUT 35YEARS, R/O PALAMADUGU VILLAGE, POLAMPALLI PS, SUKMADISTRICT, CHATTISGARH STATE. 2. MADAKAM ALIAS MADAN ALIAS MADHANNA ALIAS JAGGU ALIAS LAKSHMI ALIAS LAKKA, S/O BUDHRA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O GONDAPALLIVILLAGE, JERUGONDA PS, SUKMA DISTRICT, CHATTISGARH,RESIDENT OF GORDIGUDAV VILLAGE, TANA GOLLAPALLI. 3. SODI MANILA ALIAS MADAVISINMAYA ALIAS MANILA, W/O KOSA SODI,AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O HUREPAL VILLAGE, MIRTHUR PS,BIJAPUR, CHATTISGARH STATE, RESIDENT OF URAIPAL VILLAGE,MARTOOR POLICE STATION, BIRAM GUDI MANDAL, BHEEJAPURDISTRICT, CHATTISGARH STATE. 4. SODI MANGI ALIAS CHODI MANGI, W/O RENGU ALIAS BNPC PODIYABHEEMA, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/O PUTTEPAD VILLAGE,KISTARAM PS, SUKMA DISTRICT, CHATTISGARH STATE, RESIDENTOF DOGIPARRI VILLAGE, KISTARAM MANDAL, SUKMA DISTRICT,CHATTISGARH STATE. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Represented, By its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati, Through Assistant Commissioner of Police, Central Division, NTR Police Commissionerate, Vijayawada. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. SRINIVASULU P Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: The Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 483(1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’), seeking to modify the bail condition imposed against the petitioners/ Accused Nos.1 to 4 vide order dated 12.06.2026 in Crl.M.P.No.56 of 2026 arising out Crime No.578 of 2025 of Patamata Police Station, passed by the leaned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Krishna, Machilipatnam. 2. Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record. 3. The learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Krishna, Machilipatnam, vide order dated 12.06.2026 in Crl.M.P.No.56 of 2026 arising out Crime No.578 of 2025 of Patamata Police Station while enlarging the petitioners/ Accused Nos.1 to 4 on bail, imposed a condition that the petitioners shall produce atleast one local surety each. Insisting to produce the local sureties is against the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Moti Ram vs. State of Madhya Pradesh 1 and Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another2. 4. Hence, in the order dated 12.06.2026, condition No.(b) is hereby relaxed and condition No.(c) is modified as: "The Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 4 shall appear before the Station House Officer, Patamata Police Station, every day." 5. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 17.07.2026 JLSR 1 (1978) 4 SCC 47 2 (2022) 10 SCC 51 54 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.5643 of 2026 Date: 17.07.2026 JLSR