Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5902 (CHH)

AAKASH SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPCR/188/2026 · 2026-04-07

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:16137-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 188 of 2026 1 - Aakash Sahu S/o Laxmi Narayan Sahu Aged About 38 Years R/o Ward No. 14, Patharra, Near Thakurdiya Chowk, Rajim, Police Station Rajim District Gariyaband (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretory, Department Of Home, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar (C.G.) 2 - Station House Officer Police Station Pankhajur, District Kanker (C.G.) 3 - A.R. Jatav S/o P.R. Jatav, Executive Engineer, C.G.M.S.L., Bastar Division, District Bastar (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikas Kumar Pandey, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. S. S. Baghel, Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 08/04/2026 1. Heard Mr. Vikas Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S. S. Baghel, learned Govt. Advocate, appearing for the Respondent/State. ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2026.04.10 16:58:34 +0530 2 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: “i. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the FIR bearing Crime No.0124/2021 dated 18/09/2021 registered at Police Station Pankhajur registered for commission of offence punishable under Section 420, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC against the petitioner. ii. Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper, may also kindly be granted to the petitioners, in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to take recourse to appropriate proceedings in accordance with law for non-compliance of the order dated 21.08.2025 passed by this Court in CRMP No. 2430 of 2025. 4. Learned counsel for the State has no objection. 5. The present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 6. Certified copy, if any, filed in the petition be return back to the petitioner after retaining its attested true copy. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Alok