Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:HHC:1281 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Exe. Pt. No. 2734 of 2025 Decided on : 06.01.2026 Santosh Kumari …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.1 to 4. Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.5. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General and Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, learned counsel, accept notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4 and respondent No.5, respectively. Learned Additional Advocate General submits that the judgment in issue will be complied with, within a period of three weeks from today. His statement is 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 2026:HHC:1281 taken on record.
2. In view of the above, these proceedings are closed, with liberty to the petitioner to seek revival thereof, by filing an appropriate application, if needful is not done within a period of three weeks from today by the Authority concerned and Registry shall not insist upon the application being accompanied by the affidavit of the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
January 06, 2026 (Shivank Thakur)