Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5900 (RAJ)

SUMAN SAINI W/O VISHRAM SAINI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/3273/2026 · 2026-02-20

Anuroop Singhi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:8028] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3273/2026 Suman Saini W/o Vishram Saini, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Geejgarh, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa At Present Administrator, Gram Panchayat Geejgarh, Panchayat Samiti Sikrai, District Dausa ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. District Collector, Dausa. 3. Sub-Divisional Officer, Sikrai, District Dausa 4. Tehsildar, Sikrai, District Dausa 5. Babulal Tiwari, S/o Jagannath Tiwari 6. Ramavtar Saini, S/o Parsadi Ram Saini 7. Kailash Chand Saini, S/o Parsadi Ram Saini 8. Ramavtar Saini, S/o Prabhudayal Saini 9. Lallu Ram Saini, S/o Jamna Lal Saini 10. Banwari Lal Saini, S/o Jamna Lal Saini 11. Rajendra Kumar Gupta, S/o Radheshaym Ramgarhiya 12. Mukesh Kumar Saini, S/o Kishori Lal Saini 13. Rajulal Saini, S/o Jeevan Ram Saini 14. Malkhan, S/o Kanaran Saini 15. Madan Lal, S/o Narayan 16. Ramavtar, S/o Ganpat Lal 17. Pappu, S/o Kishanram Saini 18. Mitha Lal S/o Kishanram Saini, Respondent No.5 To 18 Are R/o Village Geejgarh, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohar Pal Meena For Respondent(s) : [2026:RJ-JP:8028] (2 of 3) [CW-3273/2026] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 20/02/2026 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- "It is, therefore, humbly prayed that Your Lordship may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and (i) By an appropriate writ, order of direction in the nature thereof the respondents may kindly be directed to remove the illegal encroachment from the land bearing Khasra No. 761 measuring 0.73 Hect. Gair Mumkin way and Khasra No. 770 measuring 0.12 Hect. situated in Village Geejgarh Tehsil Sikrai District Dausa. (ii) The respondents may further be directed to take legal action against the respondent No.5 to 18 who illegally encroached upon the aforesaid Gair Mumkin Abadi & public way. (iii) Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be given in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, prays that the present writ petition be disposed of in light of the order dated 30.01.2019 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. [D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.10819/2018] with liberty to the petitioner to file representation(s) before the Public Land Protection Cell (hereinafter referred to as ‘PLPC’) constituted in compliance of the order passed in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena (supra). [2026:RJ-JP:8028] (3 of 3) [CW-3273/2026] 3. In that view of the matter, the present writ petition stands disposed of in light of the order passed in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena (supra) with a direction to the petitioner to file representation(s) before the PLPC. It is further directed that the PLPC shall decide the representation(s), if any, filed by the petitioner, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this order. 4. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 5. Needless to say, this order has been passed only to decide the petitioner’s representation and in no manner is to be construed as a direction to decide the said representation in a particular manner. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J JAYANT KUMAR /02