[2026:RJ-JP:11809] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2962/2026 Ratiram Koli S/o Shri Lalluram Koli, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Shahar, P.s. Nadoti, District Karauli (Raj.). (Presently In Sub Jail At Hindaun City, District Karauli) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshat Sharma Mr. Anoop Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 19/03/2026 1. This misc. bail application has been filed by the petitioner Ratiram Koli S/o Shri Lalluram Koli, aged about 46 years, who was behind the bar since 29.10.2025 in connection with the FIR bearing No.275/2025 dated 01.10.2025 registered at Police Station Nadoti, District Karauli for the offences punishable under Sections 85 & 80(2) of B.N.S.. 2. Learned counsel submitted that the bail application filed by the petitioner was rejected by the Additional Session Judge No.1, Hindaun City, District Karauli vide order dated 12.02.2026, thereafter, the petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. 3. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submitted that the deceased and the accused-petitioner had entered into a [2026:RJ-JP:11809] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-2962/2026] second marriage. After their first marriage, in the case of the petitioner, his wife died in the year 2019 and in the case of the deceased, she had separated after the divorce and thereafter both of them entered into a Nata marriage for which they executed an affidavit as available on record. Learned counsel further submitted that no articles were exchanged between the parties in the marriage. On account of certain verbal altercation regarding bringing the child from the first marriage to home by the deceased, some objections were raised by the accused-petitioner which led the deceased to take a sudden emotional step, where she consumed Celphos, which is usually available in the house of a farmer and on account of which she become uncomfortable and was taken to the hospital by the accused-petitioner, where she died. 4. Learned counsel submitted that the accused-petitioner has not committed any offence and was living peaceful life with the deceased after marriage and no FIR was ever lodged or no complaint was ever made by the deceased or her family members in last more than 2 years. Learned counsel further submitted that the Police after completing the investigation has filed the charge- sheet and no recovery is required to be made and no witness has made any specific statement against him regarding cruelty, demand of dowry etc.. In view thereof, learned counsel prayed that the accused-petitioner be enlarged on bail. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposed the bail application by submitted the fact that the incident occurred on account of a sudden altercation between the parties and the deceased in a high emotional state of mind, consumed celphos. [2026:RJ-JP:11809] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-2962/2026] 6. This Court has considered the fact that the accused- petitioner and the deceased had performed a second marriage and no dowry articles were exchanged between them. It is an admitted fact, as argued by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner and supported by learned Public Prosecutor that the deceased on account of sudden emotional burst due to opposition regarding bringing the child from her first marriage to the house, consumed celphos, as a result of which she was immediately taken to the hospital by the petitioner, where she died. There was no sign of any injury on the body of the deceased. There are no previous allegations of demand of dowry or cruelty. The accused- petitioner is behind the bars since long, trial will take sufficiently long time, nature of allegations, there are no criminal antecedents, and after considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner Ratiram Koli S/o Shri Lalluram Koli on bail. 7. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Ratiram Koli S/o Shri Lalluram Koli shall be released on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The petitioner is further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse [2026:RJ-JP:11809] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-2962/2026] liberty. It is made clear that the observation as made by this Court in the bail application will not affect the trial of the case. 8. It is further directed that in case, the petitioner is found to be involved in any case within two years from the date of passing of this order, learned Public prosecutor shall file an application for cancellation of the bail. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J Monika/35