Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010051822026 2026:GAU-AS:4638 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1468/2026 M/S INNOVATIVIEW INDIA LIMITED HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 37, 3RD FLOOR, SHANTI VIHAR, KARKARDOOMA, NEW DELHI, THROUGH ITS REPRESENTATIVE MR. PRASHANT RATHORE VERSUS THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, NIRVACHAN SADAN, ASHOKA ROAD, NEW DELHI -110001. 2:THE CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER ASSAM HAVING ITS OFFICE AT BLOCK-C 4TH FLOOR ASSAM SECRETARIAT DISPUR GUWAHATI - 781006. 3:THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER ASSAM HAVING ITS OFFICE AT BLOCK-C 4TH FLOOR ASSAM SECRETARIAT DISPUR GUWAHATI -781006 4:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM ASSAM SECRETARIAT Page No.# 2/3 DISPUR GUWAHATI - 781006. 5:SNREDATAS PRIVATE LIMITED HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 3RD FLOOR SEMUSHI TOWERS PLOT NO.21 RAO AND RAJU COLONY ROAD NO.2 BANJARA HILLS HYDERABAD TELANGANA INDIA-500034 6:BRIHASPATI TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 5TH FLOOR SAHITI ARCADE 7-1621/259 SR NAGAR HYDERABAD TELENGANA INDIA-500038 Advocate for the Petitioner : N GAUTAM, MR. TANUZ KASHYAP,MR. K N CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR T DAS(R6),MR R DAS(R6),MR. D HAZARIKA(R6),MS. A CHOWDHURY(R6),MR. I CHOWDHURY SR ADV(R6),MS. S KATAKEY(SC,ECI)R1,2,3,SC, ECI BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER 27.03.2026 1. Mr. A. Saxena, learned counsel for the petitioner along with Mr. N. Gautam, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Ms. S. Katakey, learned Standing Counsel, Election Commission of India for the respondent nos. 1, 2 & 3; Mr. K. Gogoi, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent no. 4; Mr. P.K. Tiwari, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. S. Page No.# 3/3 Chakraborty, learned counsel for the respondent no. 5; and Mr. I. Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. T. Das, learned counsel for the respondent no. 6 are present. 3. The respondent nos. 1, 2 & 3 has already filed affidavit-in-opposition. 4. Mr. Gautam, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in view of the order passed today in the writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 1218/2026, the present writ petition has become infructuous and, therefore, the petitioner is not pressing this writ petition. 5. In view the above submission made by Mr. Gautam, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant