Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Tripura · body

2026 DAILYLAW 59 (TRI)

Smt. Sandhya Rani Ghosh (Som) and 10 others v. The State of Tripura and 12 others

WP(C)/203/2026 · 2026-04-07

S Datta Purkayastha

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA WP(C) No.203 of 2026 1. Smt. Sandhya Rani Ghosh (Som), W/O- Shri Prasanta Bikash Shome, Resident of Durganagar, Kali Bari Road, P.O- Khowai, P.S- Khowai, District- Khowai Tripura, 799201. 2. Smt. Gita Rani Deb, W/O- Shri Badal Dey, Resident of Ujan Abhay Nagar, Sagar Palli, P.O- Abhay Nagar, Near Hindi H.S. School, P.S- West Agartala, District- West Tripura, 799005. 3. Smt. Shipra Sarkar, W/O- Lt. Sajal Deb Roy, Resident of Krishnanagar, Pratap Roy Road, North side quarter, P.O- Agartala, P.S- West Agartala, District- West Tripura, 799001. 4. Smt. Shefali Baidya, W/O- Jiban Deb, Resident of Bhati Abhay Nagar, Contenment Para, P.O- Bhati Abhay Nagar, P.S- West Agartala, District- West Tripura, 799001. 5. Smt. Sumita Dey, D/O- Lt. Hiralal Dey, Resident of Haradhan Sangha, Krishnanagar, P.O- Agartala, P.S- West Agartala, District- West Tripura, 799001. 6. Smt. Ratna Rani Dey Deb, W/O- Lt. Bhopal Deb, Resident of Krishnagar, Badur Tali Lane, P.O- Agartala, P.S- West Agartala, District- West Tripura, 799001. 7. Smt. Gita Rudra Paul Banik, W/O- Lt. Sajal Banik, Resident of Vidyasagar, Old Bank road, Jogendra Nagar, P.O- Jogendra Nagar, P.S- East Agartala, District- West Tripura, 799004. 8. Smt. Nepu Majumder, W/O- Sudhir Debnath, Resident of Jangalia, P.O- Bishalgarh, P.S- Bishalgarh, District- Sepahijala Tripura, 799102. 9. Smt. Padma Karmakar (Sutradhar), W/O- Bhuban Ch. Sutradhar, Resident of Purba Dukli, P.O- Purba Pratapgarh, P.S- Amtali, District- West Tripura, 799004. 10. Smt. Dipali Chakraborty, W/O- Shri Sankar Chakraborty, Resident of Netaji Nagar, South Badharghat, P.O- O.N.G.C, P.S- Amatali, District- West Tripura, 799014. 11. Smt. Ava Datta (Paul), W/O- Sri Akhil Paul, Resident of Khowai, Office Tila, P.O- Khowai Court, P.S- Khowai, District- Khowai Tripura, 799202. ……Petitioner(s). V e r s u s 1. The State of Tripura, Represented by the Chief Secretary, Government of Tripura, Agartala, Civil Secretariat, P.O- Kunjaban, 799006. 2. The Director of Social Welfare & Social Education, Government of Tripura, Abhoynagar, P.O- Abhoynagar, Agartala, P.S- East Agartala, District- West Tripura. 3. The Secretary to the Government of Tripura, Department of Finance, Civil Secretariat, P.O- Kunjaban, 799006. 4. Child Development Project Officer, Matabari, ICDS Project, Udaipur, District- Gomati Tripura. 5. Child Development Project Officer, Khowai, ICDS Project, Khowai, District- Khowai Tripura. 6. Child Development Project Officer, Mulla Para AWC, UNDER ISWE, Mohanpur. 7. Child Development Project Officer, Dharmanagar N/P ICDS Project, Dharmanagar, District- North Tripura. 8. Child Development Project Officer, Narshinghar AWC, UNDER ISWE, Mohanpur. 9. Child Development Project Officer, Kamini Tila AWC, UNDER ISWE, Mohanpur. 10. Child Development Project Officer, Abhoynagar ICDS Project, Abhoynagar, Agartala. 11. Child Development Project Officer, Bishalgarh ICDS Project, Sepahijala Tripura. 12. Child Development Project Officer, Dukli ICDS Project, Badharghat, Agartala. 13. Accountant General, Tripura, Malancha Nivash, P.O- Kunjaban, P.S- East Agartala, District- West Tripura. ……Respondent(s). For Petitioner (s) : Mr. Saugat Datta, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mangal Debbarma, Addl. G.A. Mr. Agniva Chakrabarti, Advocate. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. DATTA PURKAYASTHA Order 07/04/2026 Heard learned counsel of both sides. [2] The State-respondents have entered their appearance through learned Addl. G.A., Mr. Mangal Debbarma who accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 to 12, and Mr. Agniva Chakrabarti, learned counsel, also appears and accepts notice for respondent No.13. [3] The petitioners were initially appointed as School Mothers on different dates during the year 1990 to 2009 on a fixed pay basis, and their services were regularized later on and they all went on retirement subsequently in due course of time. The relevant date of their joining as School Mothers on fixed basis, dates of their regularization and retirement are mentioned herein below in a pictorial chart: Sl. No. Name of the School Mother Date of joining in fixed pay post Date from which the services regularized Date of retirement 1. Smt. Sandhya Rani Ghosh (Som) 15.11.1999 15.11.2009 30.06.2023 2. Smt. Gita Rani Deb 20.07.1990 01.10.2007 31.07.2024 3. Smt. Shipra Sarkar 11.11.1999 11.11.2009 31.01.2023 4. Smt. Shefali Baidya 19.07.1990 01.10.2007 28.02.2023 5. Smt. Sumita Dey 19.07.1990 01.10.2007 31.05.2024 6. Smt. Ratna Rani Dey Deb 27.07.1991 01.01.2008 31.01.2025 7. Smt. Gita Rudra Paul Banik 24.11.1999 24.11.2009 28.02.2023 8. Smt. Nepu Majumder 19.07.1990 01.10.2007 31.12.2022 9. Smt. Padma Karmakar (Sutradhar) 15.11.1999 15.11.2009 31.08.2022 10. Smt. Dipali Chakraborty 24.11.1999 24.11.2009 31.03.2021 11. Smt. Ava Datta (Paul) 29.11.1999 29.11.2009 31.10.2020 [4] Now, it is the grievance of the petitioners that after they went on superannuation, while computing their pensionary benefits, their services rendered on fixed pay basis were not taken into account. In this regard, petitioner Smt. Sandhya Rani Ghosh (Som) sent an advocate’s notice on 29.01.2026 (Annexure-32 to the writ petition). Petitioner Smt. Dipali Chakraborty sent such advocate’s notice on 10.02.2026, and thereafter petitioner Smt. Ava Datta (Paul) sent an advocate’s notice on 17.02.2026 seeking similar benefits. However, according to the learned counsel of the petitioners, no such representations have been disposed of by the respondents till date. Regarding the other petitioners, learned counsel submits that liberty may be granted to these petitioners to submit representations to the respondents claiming similar benefits. Learned counsel further submits that the writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the respondents to dispose of these representations in a time- bound manner. [5] Learned counsel of the respondents submits that they have no objection if the writ petition is disposed of in the similar line by giving time- bound direction to the respondents to dispose of those representations in accordance with law. [6] In view of the above submissions, the writ petition is disposed of at this motion stage with a direction to the State-respondents to dispose of the advocate notices served upon them by petitioner Nos.1, 10 & 11 within 4(four) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order with a reasoned decision. Similarly, the other petitioners who did not submit representations earlier are also given liberty to submit their representations, if any, within 7(seven) days from today to the said respondents. If such representations are submitted by these petitioners, the same will also be disposed of by the State-respondents within 4(four) weeks, as stated above. The respondents will communicate their decision to the petitioners accordingly thereafter without delay. If further grievances still persist, liberty will be there to the petitioners to approach the appropriate forum in accordance with law. [7] With the above observations and directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. JUDGE Dinashree MUNNA SAHA Digitally signed by MUNNA SAHA Date: 2026.04.09 16:10:54 +05'30'