Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 59 (ALL)

DASHRATH CHAUHAN v. STATE OF U.P. AND 12 OTHERS

WRIC/7603/2026 · 2026-03-17

Prakash Padia

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 7603 of 2026 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed today, notices need not be issued to the private-respondents. 3. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition inter-alia with the prayer to direct the Respondent No.2 i.e., Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Nizamabad, District Azamgarh to decide the restoration application dated 03.06.2025 filed in Case No.T202415060200751 (Dashrath Chauhan and others vs. Lalta Prasad and others) within stipulated period. 4. Heard counsel for the parties. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue, the present writ petition is disposed of finally with a direction to the Respondent No.2 i.e., Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Nizamabad, District Azamgarh, to decide the aforesaid application in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within a period of three months from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order, unless there is no legal impediment. March 18, 2026 Swati Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhila Nand Pandey, Nilam Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rameshwar Prasad Shukla (Prakash Padia,J.) Dashrath Chauhan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 12 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SWATI PATHAK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SWATI PATHAK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SWATI PATHAK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad