Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5897 (RAJ)

SMT TEEJA DEVI W/O LATE SHRI KALUSINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/349/2026 · 2026-04-10

Sameer Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:15175] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 349/2026 Smt Teeja Devi W/o Late Shri Kalusingh, aged about 32 Years, R/o Village Samarthpura, P.S. Pisangan District Ajmer. (At Present In Central Jail, Ajmer). ---Accused-Applicant Versus State of Rajasthan through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 10/04/2026 1. The instant second bail application has been filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 on behalf of the accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 131/2025 registered at Police Station Pisangan, District Ajmer for the offence(s) under Sections 103(1), 238(a) and 61(2) of the BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that there is a material change in the circumstances as the FSL Report, received subsequent to passing of the previous bail order dated 31.10.2025, is not supportive of the prosecution story. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the instant bail application. It is submitted that the allegations of heinous offence qua abatement of crime have been levelled against the applicant. It is next submitted that the [2026:RJ-JP:15175] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-349/2026] applicant-wife and the primary accused were in proximate and close relationship with each other. Moreover, it is submitted that the subsequent developments in the instant matter are also supporting the case of prosecution. 5. Having heard the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, considering that the heinous offences have been levelled against the applicant; that there is no material change in the circumstances of the case, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances and material available on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is not inclined to allow the second bail application of the accused- applicant. 6. Accordingly, the second bail application filed under Section 483 BNSS is dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/s-214