Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5893 (AP)

JAYANTHI SOMESWARA SARMA & 2 OTHERS v. NAMUDURI SUBRAHMANYA SASTRY

CRP/4677/2016 · 2026-07-13

Purushottam Kumar Chintalapudi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010639172016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3606] TUESDAY, THE 14th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4677/2016 Between: 1. JAYANTHI SOMESWARA SARMA & 2 OTHERS, S/O. VENKATA SUBRAHMANYA SARMA OCC: RETD. EMPLOYEE DR. PATTABHI STREET, K.AGRAHARAM, AMALAPURAM 533 201. 2. J VS SUBRAHMANYA SARMA, S/O. VENKATA SUBRAHMANAYA SARMA DPO KAKINADA. 3. JAYANTHI SURYANARAYANA MURTHY, S/O. VENKATA SUBRAHMANYA SARMA OCC: EMPLOYEE DR. PATTABHI STREET, K.AGRAHARAM, AMALAPURAM 533201. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. NAMUDURI SUBRAHMANYA SASTRY, S/o. Suryanarayana Advocate Dr. Pattabhi Street, Amalapuram 533201. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toto set aside the orders dt. 1-9-2016 passed in EP No 40/2016 in OS No. 203/1992 ordering Rule 48 notice against the 2nd JDr/Petitioner and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2016(CRPMP 6081 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 2 grant stay of all further proceedings in EP No. 40/2016 in OS No. 203/1992 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge Court, Amalapuram pendign disposal of the main CRP and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SRINIVASA RAO PAPPU Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4677/2016 ORDER: No representation on behalf of the petitioners. On the earlier occasion also, there was no representation on their behalf. It appears that the petitioners are not interested to prosecute their case. 2. Therefore, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Interlocutory Applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _____________________________________ PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI,J Dated: 14.07.2026 ARR 4 184 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4677/2016 Dated: 14.07.2026 ARR