TATHA NAGARAJU v. LEKKALA MADHAVA REDDY AND 3 OTHERS
CRP/4291/2017 · 2026-07-13
Purushottam Kumar Chintalapudi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5892 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5892 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010217482017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3606] TUESDAY, THE 14th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4291/2017 Between:
1. TATHA NAGARAJU, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/O. D NO. 20325, BESIDE ANNAPOORNA APARTMENT BALAJI NAGAR, NELLORE CITY SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. LEKKALA MADHAVA REDDY AND 3 OTHERS, S/O. NARASIMHA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/O. D NO. 10-75, PEDDA IRLAPADU VILLAGE AND MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT
2. KUPPANAGIRI SUBBA REDDY, S/O. NAGI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS RIO. D NO. 1-6, PALETI PALLI VILLAGE, PEDDACHERLOPALLI MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT
3. ATLA RATHAIAH, S/O. PEDDA MALAKONDAIAHAGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O. USTHUMVAARI PALLI VILLAGE CHERLLADENI POST, KANIGIRI MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT
4. MANIKANTHA REDDY, S/O. MEDAGAM NAGI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS RIO. D NO. 4-919, DARSI VILLAGE AND MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be
2
pleased toto direct the court below ie., PRl. Sr. Civil Judge, Nellore to entertain and receive IPCF.No. 8170 of 2017 IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRPMP 5648 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the court below i.e., Principal Senior Civil Judge, Nellore to entertain the IP CF No. 8170/2017 and to pass judgment and decree in favour of the petitioner to declare the petitioner as Insolvency, pending disposal of main CRP and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P RAJA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4291/2017
ORDER:
No representation on behalf of the petitioner. On the earlier occasions also, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute his case. 2. Therefore, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Interlocutory Applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.
_____________________________________ PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI,J
Dated: 14.07.2026 ARR
4
186 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4291/2017 Dated: 14.07.2026
ARR