SMT KAJAL SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/35393/2026 · 2026-09-07
Gautam Chowdhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5891 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5891 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35393 of 2026 Court No. - 75 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.
1. At the very outset, learned Counsel for the petitioner has been informed that in the instant case an F.I.R. has already been lodged, the instant petition has become infructuous.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners could not dispute the aforesaid submissions made by learned Standing Counsel.
3. In view of above, the instant petition has become infructuous and is dismissed as having become infructuous.
September 8, 2026 S.Ali Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.) Smt Kajal Singh And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHAUKAT ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad