CRL OP No. 19328 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 24.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Crl.O.P.No.19328 of 2026 1.Baskar @ V.Vijayabaskar 2.Sambhasivam ... Petitioner(s)/A7 & A8 Vs. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Gudiyatham Taluk Police Station, Vellore District. ... Respondent(s) PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in connection with Crime No.122 of 2026, on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner(s) : Mr.A.Vijayakumar For Respondent(s) : Mr.R.S.Indira Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ORDER The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1) and 351(3) of BNS Act 2023 in Crime No.122 of 2026, seek anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 19328 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity between the petitioners and the defacto complainant’s brother, there was a wordy altercation, which escalated into violence, as a result of which, the petitioner along with other accused assaulted the defacto complainant’s brother and caused injuries. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent and they have nothing to do with the alleged offence and a false case has been foisted against the petitioners. He would further submit that the petitioners are ready to co-operate for investigation. Hence, he prays for the grant of anticipatory bail. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) opposed the anticipatory bail application by reiterating the prosecution case and submitted that the injured died in the hospital and that the investigation is pending. Hence, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5. From the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent, it is seen that the injured died in the hospital and the investigation is still pending. In such view of the position, this https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 19328 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 Court is of the firm view that it is not appropriate to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 24.07.2026 smv To 1.The Inspector of Police, Gudiyatham Taluk Police Station, Vellore District. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 19328 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN ,J. smv Crl.O.P.No.19328 of 2026 24.07.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis