S Gopal Engineering Contractor v. The State Tax Officer, RS II/Adjudication Intelligence, Salem
WP/28032/2026 · 2026-07-30
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 58861 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 58861 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 28032 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 28032 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.30696 of 2026 S Gopal Engineering Contractor GSTIN 33AIEPG7376B1ZK, Represented by its Proprietor S.Gopal, No.1/102, Sappanipatty Kattu Valavu, Vanavasi, Mettur Dam, Salem - 636457 ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Tax Officer, RS II/Adjudication Intelligence, Salem 3rd Floor, Commercial Taxes Office Building, Pitchards Road, Hasthampatty, Salem -636 007 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the respondent’s demand order made in Reference No. ZD3306251456765 dated 16.06.2025 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to given an opportunity of personal hearing. For Petitioner(s): M/s. P. Suresh Babu Ganesan .K For Respondent(s): Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, Government Counsel (Tax) ********* https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 28032 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER An order dated 16.06.2025 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 2. Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 3. On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that such order was issued without hearing the petitioner. The writ petition has been filed after the period of limitation expired. 4. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to remit 25% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect has been made on the bundle. 5. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 28032 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4
6. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected writ miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
30-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA To The State Tax Officer, RS II/Adjudication Intelligence, Salem 3rd Floor, Commercial Taxes Office Building, Pitchards Road, Hasthampatty, Salem -636 007 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 28032 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA WP No. 28032 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.30696 of 2026 30-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis