RAHUL KISHOR PATIL v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
WP/11367/2026 · 2026-09-01
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5885 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5885 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 903-wp 11367-2026.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 11367 OF 2026 Rahul Kishor Patil .. Petitioner Versus The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others .. Respondents Mr. Chandrakant R. Thorat, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. P. S. Patil, AGP for Respondents-State. Mr. M. D. Narwadkar, Advocate for Respondent No. 4.
CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT AND JITENDRA JAIN, JJ.
DATE : 01st SEPTEMBER, 2026.
PER COURT :-
1. Heard the parties.
2. The peculiar facts of the case that the petitioner would lose his admission to M.Tech course. He is not in a position to submit the validity certificate showing that he belongs to a Scheduled Tribe. It is submitted that, though the common vigilance cell’s report is received on 08.06.2026, the same is accepted only in case of his real brother and not in the case of petitioner. Because of this inaction the petitioner apprehends that, no proceeding will 2026:BHC-AUG:39943-DB
2 903-wp 11367-2026.odt be concluded.
3. The learned A.G.P. on specific instructions from the committee makes a statement that hearing would be given to the petitioner on 04.09.2026 and the judgment would be delivered at the most by afternoon on 05.09.2026.
4. By accepting this statement, the writ petition stands
disposed of.
5. Though certain earlier orders are pointed out to this Court, this Court for the present would not go into the same. However, it is expected of the committee members to act promptly and to see that no finger is pointed out at their conduct.
( JITENDRA JAIN, J.) ( KISHORE C. SANT, J. )
P.S.B.