Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5881 (ALL)

MANISHA ALIAS MANISHA CHAUHAN v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/31458/2026 · 2026-09-07

Krishan Pahal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 31458 of 2026 Court No. - 68 (Sr. No.14 out of 185) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Zaheer Asghar, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Rajendra Prasad Singh, learned State Law Officer for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.172 of 2026, under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 121(1), 127(2), 324(4), 61(2), 191(3), 190, 326(G), 125, 132, 195(2), 285 BNS, Section 3/4 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act and Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station Phase-I, District Commissionerate Gautam Buddh Nagar, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The allegations levelled against her are per se false, and she has no concern whatsoever with the alleged offence. It is submitted that she has been falsely nominated in the instant case and that she is neither the leader nor has she any connection with the alleged rioting or raising of slogans. No specific role or overt act has been attributed to the applicant. As such, she is entitled to bail. In all, 11 cases were foisted on the applicant at one go. She is in jail since 12.4.2026. She undertakes to cooperate with the trial and not misuse the liberty of bail. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Syed Ahmed Faizan, Sr. Advocate, Zaheer Asghar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Manisha Alias Manisha Chauhan .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 5. Learned State Law Officer has vehemently opposed the bail application but the submissions raised by the learned counsel for the applicant could not be disputed. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into consideration the fact that no specific role or overt act has been attributed to the applicant, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima-facie the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant- Manisha Alias Manisha Chauhan, be released on bail in the aforementioned case crime on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that she shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 8. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. September 8, 2026 Vikas Verma BAIL No. 31458 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad