M.Sakthiramu v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Sempatti
CRL OP(MD)/6224/2026 · 2026-03-30
R Vijayakumar
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5879 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5879 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :30.03.2026
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR CRL.O.P(MD)No.6224 of 2026 and CRL.M.P(MD)Nos.6732 and 6734 of 2026 1.M.Sakthiramu 2.P.Manoj Pandi ... Petitioners/Accused No.1 and 2 .Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, through The Inspector of Police, Sempatti Police Stati0on, Dindigul District. (Crime No.288 of 2024) ...Ist Respondent/De-jure Complainant 2.Muthulakshmi ...2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS,2023, praying this Court to call for the records connected with the proceedings in C.C.No.181 of 2024, on the file of learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Athoor and quash the same as illegal. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
For Petitioners : Mr.K.Lenin For Respondent-1 : Mr.R.Meenakshi Sundaram Additional Public Prosecutor O R D E R The present Petition has been filed by the accused persons in Crime No.288 of 2024, on the file of the first respondent-Police seeking to quash the charge-sheet, wherein, the Petitioners are alleged to have committed the offence under Sections 296(b), 351(2),117(2),118(2) and 127(2) of BNSS,2023. 2.A perusal of the charge-sheet reveals that the Petitioners who are the collection agents of the finance company came to the house of the de-facto complainant, abused her and attacked her. The accident register revels that the Petitioners have threatened the defactco complainat and attacked her husband with hands. 3.According to the learned counsel for the Petitioners, false case has been foisted against them, who are the collection agents of the finance company. However, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the first respondent-Police brought to the notice of this Court that fracture has been caused to the defacto complainant. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
4.Considering the above said medical records, prima facie case is made out against the Petitioners, however, the trial Court shall conduct the proceedings on merits without being influenced by any of the observations made by this Court. Since Prima facie case is made out, this Court is not inclined to quash the charge sheet, especially, in the light of the fact that no legal ground is made out. 5.Considering the above said facts, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. However, the presence of the peitioners is dispensed with during trial, unless specific orders are passed by the trial Court for their appearance. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 30.03.2026 NCS : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No vsn To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Athoor. 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2.The Inspector of Police, Sempatti Police Stati0on, Dindigul District. (Crime No.288 of 2024).
Copy to The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. R.VIJAYAKUMAR.,J. vsn
ORDER MADE IN 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL.O.P(MD)No.6224 of 2026 and CRL.M.P(MD)Nos.6732 and 6734 of 2026 30.03.2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis