Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 56BA1285.2026.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 56 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1285 OF 2026 Aditya Lahu Sakat VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra ... Mr. Rahul R. Karpe - Advocate for Applicant Mr. S. D. Ghayal – Addl. P. P. for the State ...
CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.
DATED : 31ST AUGUST, 2026 PER COURT :
1. After hearing the learned Advocate for the Applicant and perusing the records, when this Court expressed its disinclination to allow the Application, the learned Advocate for the Applicant, without inviting any order of dismissal of Application, on instructions seeks permission to withdraw the present Application, with liberty to file a fresh application after a period of six months from today.
2. The Application stands disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty to the Applicant to file a fresh application before the learned Trial Court if there is no substantial progress in the trial.
3. If any such application is filed, the learned Trial Court shall decide the same on its own merits.
[ HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR ] JUDGE
SG Punde Signed by: Sandeep Gulabrao Punde Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 02/09/2026 18:32:27