Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15144 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 23.07.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP(MD). No. 15144 of 2026 Murali ... Petitioner Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Panagudi Police Station, Tirunelveli District. (Crime No.999 of 2026) ...Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.R.Maheswaran for Mr.P.Praveenkumar Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.N.Balasubramanian Counsel for State of TN (Crl. side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No. 999 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 316(2) and 351(2) of BNS, in Crime No.999 of 2026, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15144 of 2026 bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is the husband of the defacto complainant. Though the defacto complainant has arranged small business of maintaining the chicken farm by paying huge amount, the petitioner has not taken care of the business and further when she questioned the same, this petitioner attempted to attack her by using aruval. Hence, the complaint was lodge, the case was registered. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he was falsely implicated in this case and he is in no way connected in the above said incident. He has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Due to previous enmity with false accusations, this present case has been foisted against him. He has no previous cases. The petitioner is ready to co-operate with the investigation. Hence, she prays to grant Anticipatory Bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the State reiterated the prosecution case and reported that the FIR has been registered only recently. The petitioner has no previous case. Investigation in this case is still pending. He opposed 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15144 of 2026 grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the rival submissions on either side, the nature of offences charged against the petitioner, there is no previous case against the petitioner, and also considering all the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions: [a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of three weeks, thereafter, as and when required for interrogation; [c] the petitioner shall not commit any offences of similar 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15144 of 2026 nature. [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S (K R S J) 23.07.2026 TM To 1. The Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor. 2.The Inspector of Police, Panagudi Police Station, Tirunelveli District.(Crime No.999 of 2026) 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15144 of 2026 K. RAJASEKAR, J. TM ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No. 15144 of 2026 Date : 23.07.2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis