Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5871 (ALL)

TASVEER AHMAD ALI v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/8536/2026 · 2026-09-07

Rajiv Lochan Shukla

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 8536 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Sri Vinod Kumar Yadav, Advocate holding brief of Sri Akhilesh Kumar Singh, has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the informant, today in Court, which is taken on record. 2. At the very outset, the Learned A.G.A. has raised an objection that the offences alleged against the applicant are not punishable with imprisonment exceeding seven years. It is further submitted that the charge-sheet has been filed and there is no apprehension of arrest of the applicant, therefore, the present application seeking anticipatory bail is not maintainable. 3. After some arguments, the Learned counsel for the applicant prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the present application with liberty to the applicant to approach the concerned Court and apply for regular bail, which may be directed to be decided in accordance with the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773, and the subsequent orders passed by the Supreme Court in the above-mentioned case. 4. The Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the said prayer. 5. Taking into account the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, it is directed that in case the applicant appears in Case Crime Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Brijesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Singh, G.A. Tasveer Ahmad Ali .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) No.40 of 2026, under Sections 76, 333, 115(2), 351(3), 352 BNS, Police Station Azeem Nagar, District Rampur, before the Court concerned within a period of four weeks from today and applies for bail, his bail application shall be considered and disposed of expeditiously in accordance with law laid down by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil (supra), without being influenced by any observations made by the concerned Court, while rejecting the anticipatory bail application of the applicant. 6. For a period of four weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant pursuant to the above-mentioned case. 7. With the aforesaid observations/directions, this application stands disposed of. September 8, 2026 S.A. NABAIL No. 8536 of 2026 2 (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- SALMAN AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad